Log in

No account? Create an account

[icon] Sunt Lacrimae Rerum
View:Recent Entries.
You're looking at the latest 20 entries.
Missed some entries? Then simply jump back 20 entries

Subject:Moving to DW
Time:09:06 pm
I will be leaving my posts here for a while (not importing them wholesale to DW) but will not be making new posts to LJ. Account will remain active only to comment on others' LJ posts.
comments: 2 comments or Leave a comment

Subject:Has it ever occurred to the people sponsoring earth hour...
Time:08:34 pm
... that burning candles has a much higher carbon cost than consuming hydro-electric or nuclear electric power, and probably higher than natural-gas power (efficiency per lumen bring better)?

ETA:the obviously correct thing to do would be to run LED lights off the mains. Or have Earth Hour at 10:00 AM on a weekday morning and have everybody shut down lights, computers, etc. for an hour.
comments: 1 comment or Leave a comment

Tags:, ,
Subject:Littérature Engagée
Time:09:56 pm
In 1976 I spent a year in France when my father was on sabbatical. The first paper I had to write in my Lycée French class was on "La Littérature Engagée". I argued at the time (I recall) for the primacy of pure art over any mandate for political engagement; I would take a somewhat more nuanced view now, beginning with the recognition (which makes the whole debate somewhat pointless) that no literature can avoid being somewhat engaged, regardless of the intent of the author, even if that intent is as purely literary and abstract as, say, Mallarmé's.

Through nothing more than coincidence, I have just been reading both Gordon's Teskey's The Poetry of John Milton[1] and Brust's / White's The Skill of our Hands.

Teskey's book is a summation of decades if teaching Milton, and covers his entire poetic career. It is thoroughly grounded in both the history of Milton's lifetime and in the sources Milton absorbed and transmuted. (Teskey knows Italian, Latin, and Greek, has familiarity with the literary works central to the traditions Milton drew on, and also enough of a grasp of Christian theology to discuss Milton's theological positions intelligently.) It is well worth reading.

One thing that comes through is the degree to which Milton's work (from about Comus on) is always "engaged", even if only with what Teskey calls transcendental engagement.

(Comus has a nice slipped-in bit: in the middle if a masque, that most aristocratic of entertainments, performed in front of one of the great officers of the realm, the Lady's statement that

If every just man that now pines with want
Had but a moderate and beseeming share
Of that which lewdly-pamper'd Luxury
Now heaps upon som few with vast excess,
Natures full blessings would be well dispenc't
In unsuperfluous eeven proportion,
And she no whit encomber'd with her store,
And then the giver would be better thank't,
His praise due paid, for swinish gluttony
Ne're looks to Heav'n amidst his gorgeous feast,
But with besotted base ingratitude
Cramms, and blasphemes his feeder.

-- an appeal for radical egalitarianism.)

Adam and Eve's society in Eden is, for Milton, the only valid polity in human history, and it is, formally, outside history. Milton's writing aims to push the reader into a mindset, and a course of action, aimed at bringing an ideal order into being here and in this dispensation. (The classic study of the reader in Paradise Lost is Fish's Surprised by Sin.)

We have become used to a discourse in which, because it is asserted that everything is political, and because many works elicit strong personal reactions because of traits which align them with one side or another in the culture wars, we tend to forget what fully engaged political works are actually like.

Regardless of whether troglodytes get worked up about them, works which are "political" mainly in the sense that they have diverse leading characters and display more polities than simply feudal ones in their fantasy/future worlds are not political, or at least engagedly political, in the same sense that, say Uncle Tom's Cabin was, or indeed Paradise Lost.

By contrast, The Skill of our Hands is very much an engaged book - oddly, even more on its publication than when it was being written.

At the time of its composition, its authors could not have known that it would be published amid a flurry of executive orders on immigration and deportation. They did know that the Obama Administration has increased markedly the number of deportations of undocumented immigrants, and that the general militarization of the police - a continuing trend not only in the US but more generally - was at its apex in the south.

It is explicitly an engaged work: it is about resistance; it layers the undocumented immigrant issue over that if slavery in Buchanan's day; it ends with a direct call to action. (It also slips in an aside about HFCS as a public-health concern.)

It also works as a novel, although it helps if the reader has first read The Incrementalists as a preparation.

[1]Disclosure: Teskey was an undergraduate student of my father's and a graduate student of a friend (and through the latter I see him from time to time when he returns to Canada for a visit).
comments: Leave a comment

Subject:Tawney on the Working Classes
Time:08:17 pm
How things have not changed:

R.H. Tawney, writing of the English working class in 1929 (in Equality):

"They still often accept quite tamely an organization of industry under which half a dozen gentlemen, who are not always conspicuously wiser than their neighbours, determine the conditions of life and work for several thousand families, and an organization of finance which enables a handful of bankers to raise and lower the economic temperature of a whole community, and an organization of justice which makes it difficult, as Sir Edward Parry has shown, for a poor man to face the cost of obtaining it, and an organization of education which still makes higher education inaccessible to the great majority of working-class children…"

There have been some few adjustments in the U.K. since 1929, but looking instead at the United States as it is today, this seems like a fair description, not only of where things stand, but of the direction in which things are going.
comments: 1 comment or Leave a comment

Subject:Chivalric Romance and its Descendents
Time:07:48 pm
Back in the High Middle Ages, a literary form developed (well, many literary forms developed, but I'm interested in one): the chivalric romance. Most English-speakers get little contact with the form, unless they're specialists (the main example in English is Sir Gawain and the Green Knight; most of the examples of the form are in French and the final extreme derivatives of it are in Italian -- Boiardo and Ariosto). We do get exposure to them indirectly through Malory -- much of the Morte d'Arthur is translations (somewhat simplified) of French verse romances regarding Arthur. Mediaevalists meet the form in Chaucer (The Knight's Tale being a reasonable example, coming by way of an adaptation from the Italian, and Troilus and Criseyde has some of the marks of one although it has a different formal structure).

The typical form of the verse romance involves knights on quests: I use the plural advisedly, because the general form relies heavily on interlaced adventures, although some examples (like the Gawain poem) do not. In the period, they had a clear social function: to reflect an ideal of chivalric behaviour back towards the nobles who were their audience (many if not most of these poems were the products of aristocratic households). In this they are similar to many of the lyric forms of the same period, which played the game of amour courtois and were frequently not only for but by aristocratic figures. In both cases, the ideals and forms reflected and reinforced a life of leisure (qualified by the fact that the "leisure" involved strenuous military training) and a deliberate separation of social rules from those of other layers of society. (For a discussion of how this reflection worked in actual life, I can direct the reader to Lee Paterson's Chaucer and the Subject of History, which not only analyses examples in Chaucer's work but discusses their reception and the social context.)

(There's a secondary audience which developed later on: a middle-class one which read the stories as pure escapism, the one made fun of in The Knight of the Burning Pestle. But they were not the payors for the original production of the works, and with the decline of the old feudal aristocracy the form basically vanished.)

The chivalric code these works reflected back at the reader (more likely, the auditor, as these would have been read aloud) exalted both prowess and a relatively narrow form of "honour". It did not align in all things with the general mediaeval Catholic Christian ethic (which is why the Grail Quest story in its final form, which has the form of a romance but a content provided by monastic writers, is so aggressively against many of the chivalric patterns, and why Lancelot, the epitome of the chivalric, fails as compared to Bors, Percival, and Galahad). Its audience, however, was happy to take it as normative, and the works can be considered a form of reinforcement of that ideal.

That is not, however, the end of the story.

Consider Raymond Chandler: "But down these mean streets a man must go who is not himself mean, who is neither tarnished nor afraid. The detective in this kind of story must be such a man. He is the hero, he is everything. He must be a complete man and a common man and yet an unusual man. He must be, to use a rather weathered phrase, a man of honor, by instinct, by inevitability, without thought of it, and certainly without saying it. He must be the best man in his world and a good enough man for any world.... The story is his adventure in search of a hidden truth, and it would be no adventure if it did not happen to a man fit for adventure."

The hard-boiled detective novel of the 1930s and 1940s picks up on the overall shape of the chivalric quest, with a twist. The case parallels the knight's quest, and the P.I., like the knight, moves on the edges of society; it is not a coincidence that, just as the knight has to deal with regular challenges from hostile (or even just ambitious) knights which involve significant mayhem, the hard-boiled detetcive is typically beaten up in the course of a case.

Like the knight, the P.I. (as Chandler notes, not a realistic one: "The private detective of fiction is a fantastic creation who acts and speaks like a real man. He can be completely realistic in every sense but one, that one sense being that in life as we know it such a man would not be a private detective.") hews to a code requiring prowess, toughness, a certain amount of care with regards to women (for all of the difference between the ladies amour courtois and the dames of the hard-boiled stories), and a central integrity.

One key element changes in this transposition, though: where the audience of the verse romance wanted to see the knight as someone whom they should emulate, whose code they shared, the audience of the hard-boiled detective story instead relates to them as society does to Jane Jacobs' Guardians: these patrol the outside of our society, not being like us (tougher, stronger, more determined), but (along with the police, with whom they interact) making it possible for society to continue on its way.

If the works have a social function beyond entertainment, then it is not reinforcement (as with the chivalric romance) but rather reassurance: that at least notionally there are guardians out there protecting the circle of society. (Per George Johnston: "Around the battlements go by/Soldier men against the sky,/Violent lovers, husbands, sons,/Guarding my peaceful life with guns.")

There is a further twist to this story.

As it currently stands, the subgenre of urban fantasy has a significant presence of (if not "is dominated by") stories which in their form and protagonists have a direct and unmistakeable descent from the hard-boiled detective story. Sometimes the principal characters are literally PIs (October Daye); sometimes they fill that role within a narrative structure very like that of the PI novel (Harry Dresden, Anita Blake, Matthew Swift, Kate Daniels).

However, these figures do not notionally guard us against dangers which we might take as really out there, the inhabitants of a "realistic" underworld. They guard against dangers which are, by definition, unreal, not just in the sense that they don't exist but in the sense that they cannot. The dangers against which the heroes guard have been displaced into the imaginary, much as the secondary middle class audience for Amadis de Gaula and Sir Isumbras took them as straight tales of marvels rather than as mirrors of behaviour to follow.
comments: Leave a comment

Subject:Douglas Cowling (1950-2017)
Time:09:28 am
Doug Cowling died last Monday of a heart attack; his funeral was on Friday.

He was best known for his work on the Classical Kids CDs; he was responsible for the core creative work on five of them (Mozart’s Magic Fantasy, Tchaikovsky Discovers America, Vivaldi’s Ring of Mystery, Hallelujah Handel! ‑ and Mozart’s Magnificent Voyage), of which four won Juno awards (the awards still sit on his piano at home). On the pure musicology side, he also provided much of the planning for Toronto's Tallis Choir (of which he was a founding member) and contributed program notes to the Tallis Choir and Toronto Classical Singers.

Doug had begun his post-University career in English rather than music, though. He taught English at Seneca College until the late 1980s, and at George Brown for some years after that. He then succeeded David Parry as Artistic Director of the Poculi Ludique Societas, a mediaeval drama group based at the University of Toronto. (I have known Doug since 1984, but my first extended contact with him was when I was in a mystery play he directed as part of the PLS's Towneley Cycle production in 1985; he also directed plays in the York Cycle in 1977, the Chester Cycle in 1983, N-Towne in 1988, and York Cycle again in 1998, as well as a production of Philippe de Mezières' Presentation of the Virgin in 1988 for which I was MC in Choir.) His first publications were in this area: "The Liturgical Celebration of Corpus Christi in Medieval
York", REED Newsletter 1 (1976), and a brief note in 1988 published in Notes and Queries on "The Angels' Song in Everyman".

After leaving PLS he was a Church Music Director at several churches. He had a long-standing interest in liturgy, having co-authored Sharing the Banquet: Liturgical Renewal in your Parish with Fr. Paul Maclean (1994), which was based on years of experience with "experimental" liturgy at the "folk mass" (not really, long story, few to no guitars) at Saint Mary Magdalene, which he effectively ran after Fr. Eugene Fairweather retired in the mid 1980s. He also contributed to Let Us Keep the Feast, ed. Kevin Flynn (1999), a collection of papers on Holy Week liturgy. He had a strong interest in congregational liturgical participation, and his musical compositions are largely designed to encourage it. He left detailed musical and liturgical instructions for his funeral, for which I was MC; a very highly experienced scratch choir provided the music.

Doug's sense of humour, as well as the breadth and depth of his scholarship, struck everyone who knew him. Peter Walker, a brother-in-law, describes him as "a funny, larger-than-life, sometimes Falstaffian figure…an artful, cultivated renaissance-man". I would concur in all of these things. He will be missed.
comments: 2 comments or Leave a comment

Subject:Rosa mystica, Turris Davidica
Time:11:51 am
There is no rose of swich vertu
As is the rose that bare Jhesu.

For in this rose conteynyd was
Heven and erthe in lytyl space,
Res miranda.

Be that rose we may weel see
That he is God in personys three,
Pari forma.

The aungelys sungyn the shepherdes to
'Gloria in excelcis Deo.'

Leve we all this wordly merthe,
And folwe we this joyful berthe;
comments: 1 comment or Leave a comment

Time:08:57 am
For about the 100th time I have been reading a book of science popularization when it stops dead to explain the imaginary and complex numbers from scratch.

It's been almost 250 years since Euler's Elements of Algebra. Maybe it's time to introduce C and a complete coverage of the number system as part of a basic mathematical education in elementary school?
comments: 6 comments or Leave a comment

Subject:Why I am disowning my undergraduate university
Time:07:38 pm
I greatly enjoyed, and benefited from, the time I spent as an undergraduate. I went to a small university which was focussed on undergraduate (B.A., B.Sc.) studies in the humane letters and core sciences. Its main distinction was not its specific programmes (although it had a few interdisciplinary areas: Environmental Studies, Native Studies, Canadian Studies) but its overall undergraduate focus, with small tutorials, a liberal arts orientation, and faculty who (in the absence of graduate studies) could focus on the more junior students.

The disciplines I took - English, Classics (Greek), Mathematics, French - had decently structured curricula and requirements which not only ensured that one would, if a major, get an even grounding in the discipline, but would also he able to plan fairly clearly what one wanted to take (for example, second year Greek offered a prose course (Attic 5th century) and a poetry course on Epic and Tragedy (a book of the Odyssey, a book of the Iliad, a tragedy by Sophocles, a tragedy by Euripides); as a Minor student I took the latter). The English curriculum had a few holes in its requirements - if one wanted to, one could graduate with an honours major without ever taking one of Milton or Pope (but not both) - but otherwise provided the necessary courses for a solid grounding. The French department required all majors to take Corneille and Racine, which made sense, given their preeminence. (I dabbled, having a lycée background in French Literature, and studied French poetry instead: I had already has my exposure to Polyeucte and Phèdre and wanted to cover some topics I hadn't already been as thoroughly exposed to.)

I received (yet another) appeal via e-mail for donations as an alumnus. I had been hearing things about the current state of the place - my father is a Professor Emeritus - and noting that advertisements I saw on the subway were increasingly vocation-oriented; so I downloaded a copy of the current academic calendar.

They've trashed the place. Why I say that will take a bit of explaining.

Why do we consider humane letters - literature, classics, history - to be worth supporting with public money for study at a university level?

The strictly utilitarian answer, represented recently by the Federal CPC's higher education policy, is that the study improves critical thinking to prepare students for the business world. However, this is at best an argument for some form of post-secondary education, and not for specific forms which are, honestly, as far away from the requirements of business as you can reasonably get before crossing over into the fine arts. This is the basis of innumerable jokes regarding arts majors ("Do you want fries with that?").

In fact, the use of first degrees as credentialism is well-embedded in HR departments mainly as a shortcut, weeding out people whose capacity was insufficient to get through a degree rather than preferencing those whose skills were enhanced by four years of studying Aelfric, Baudelaire, Greek particles, or the Raj. (It also has a less upfront goal of weeding out working class or poor students whose access to the system was less easy, and whose ability to succeed in university was conditioned, even once they got access, to mimic their middle-class co-students.)

And it certainly does not answer the question of why public money supports research into, say, Alcuin's letters.

(At the other extreme, the idea of pure "ivory tower" research, if taken seriously, may be a justification for funding, but it doesn't provide a model for what to fund; nor does it provide a reason why students who are not focussed on being dedicated scholars should be pressed into such an environment for three or four years.)

Note that I'm using funding as a shorthand for "social support": in some systems there is no public funding as such - just about any system until the mid 19th Century, to begin with - but there's a social/philosophical reason why such institutions have a (usually high-status) place made for them.

It's a much rehashed area, beginning (arbitrarily) with Newman and proceeding forward through modern educational arguments, and with roots going hack through the Querelle des Anciens et Modernes to the curricula of the ancient and mediaeval worlds. Anything I have to say about it will be profoundly unoriginal.

Two lines of thought seem to me to be fruitful, though.

First, as a culture and a society, we define our commonalities and values by reference to a bundle of core givens including art, literature, certain historical narratives. For literature and the arts, these form canons.

We can't really get away from this. We can drop and add works to a canon, ignore or rediscover or add in historical sub-narratives, and even allow for simultaneous but differing sets to coexist together as long as they share some common values (see, for example, Wieselter's Kaddish for a sense of what western history looks like from inside a Jewish perspective). A curriculum which officially rejects "the Canon" in favour of including works from marginalized voices is not escaping from the canonical but merely expanding the Canon at the behest of certain fundamental values.

Much of the 19th Century enterprise in American literature was about trying to define a Canon for that part of the New World. Like all such efforts, it built on what had come before - Shakespeare was wildly popular, Longfellow translated Dante, Bunyan was important, Milton influential - but added in new themes and authors: Thoreau, Twain, Hawthorne, Melville. The American Revolution and Civil War provided historical narratives used to define USAn identity.

The same can be said of the mid 20th Century and Canada: Davies, Atwood, Laurence, Richler, Munro, and so on have become (partly for quality and partly for other reasons) a substantial part of a high school curriculum and Canadian Literature has a secure place in any Canadian English Department. (Note that it's open at a tertiary education level to ignore parts of a broad canon in favour of getting a groundwork in foundations: an argument can be made that the serious study of literature in English can be best grounded in a study of the generally best and most influential works, which would tend to emphasize more heavily older works and those with an international impact.)

For the past several centuries, a normative mix would have been (still is, in many ways): material from the classical world (my daughter's grade 9 English course has a Greek mythology component, and she is able to take Latin; at large, classical literary themes, philosophy, and history still play a significant role in public discourse and thought); from the English Renaissance (mainly Shakespeare in the schools, but the Tudors and Stuarts still occupy a niche in our collective memory palace); from the early 19th Century and the Napoleonic Wars, although the Romantics and Scott have faded out somewhat. The Victorians maintain a foothold in both popular and scholarly culture. World War II now occupies a large block of the collective history remembered generally (look at the history section in any bookstore), and more recent, local histories and narratives supplement the core, as do some reflecting minority viewpoints.

Secondly, although the old belief in the extensive benefits of an education in humane letters has been somewhat constrained by the experience of the 20th Century - see Steiner's Language and Silence - there is still an argument to be made that such an education produces benefits in the recipients which make them better and more informed citizens, possibly more discerning moral agents, and better equipped to improve their own quality of life.

This argument leans on both arms of the old defenses of literature as pleasant and utile, and on the perception that not learning history condemns one to repeat it. (Of course, one could repeat it in any case, like the Bourbons, forgetting nothing and learning nothing. You can lead a horse to water...) As such, it relies on the choice of topic, preferring the better over the worse as topics of study.

(As an aside, yes, there really are such absolute distinctions, unless one is genuinely ready to consider Milton the peer of Heavysedge).

The new curricula have thrown all that overboard. There are no longer, for example, any firm requirements regarding what one has to take to get a major in English. The department recommends some groupings, and a dedicated serious student could more or less approximate the courses I took, but the majority of courses are thematic in nature, some restricted to a given period, some diachronic. The better courses would in fact - at least as titles - make good graduate courses for students who already had a solid grounding; as undergraduate courses they amont to dabbling.

The modern language department website does not talk about literature at all; it's all about the uses of language in government or business. There are some courses in the standard canonical French texts in the syllabus, but none are required for a major in French (some small amount of study of Québécois literature is mandatory).

There is no set content for courses in Greek; they are of the form "Continuation of ancient Greek syntax and grammar, followed by readings from ancient authors". No specific texts are listed; conceivably the same course could be Homer in one year (it's at the level I took Homer at), Xenophon in another, and Procopius in a third, based on the inclinations of the teacher.

Cross-disciplinary programmes abound. I love good cross-disciplinary work, but the good work I see is produced by authors who have spent their years in the trenches of slog.

There's a frequent vocational tone to the material addressed to students: "Students of philosophy develop advanced skills in critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication – valuable foundations in any number of career choices"; "You will develop exceptional research and communication skills [in History] that can be applied across many career options". We have let our community colleges become universities, but we our universities, at the undergraduate level, are promoting themselves as glorified community colleges.

(As far as skills in the workplace go, I'm not sure I use any skills which I did not develop in high school or, alternatively, on my own and not in my university years (like computer programming). I did start out for about six or seven years using knowledge I acquired in Law School, which is a very different kettle of fish from an undergraduate programme.)

Put bluntly, the appeal is a combination of the superficially glitzy and the unabashedly mercantile.

This "small university" is now four times the size it was in my day; they have sold their birthright for growth (and considerably upped the size of the graduate programme as well: the government funds graduate students much better than undergraduates.

The characteristics which I consider the important ones from my day are gone. I can no longer in good faith recommend it to someone looking for advice on university choice.
comments: Leave a comment

Subject:Local weather
Time:08:11 am
What is the late November doing
With the disturbance of the spring
And creatures of the summer heat,
And snowdrops writhing under feet
And hollyhocks that aim too high
Red into grey and tumble down
Late roses filled with early snow?
Thunder rolled by the rolling stars
Simulates triumphal cars
Deployed in constellated wars
Scorpion fights against the sun
Until the Sun and Moon go down
Comets weep and Leonids fly
Hunt the heavens and the plains
Whirled in a vortex that shall bring
The world to that destructive fire
Which burns before the ice-cap reigns

-T.S. Eliot, "East Coker"
comments: 1 comment or Leave a comment

Subject:Martinmas, remembrance
Time:08:05 pm

Retrospective, and, I fear, prospective:

But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place;' some swearing, some crying for a surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left. I am afeard there are few die well that die in a battle; for how can they charitably dispose of any thing, when blood is their argument? Now, if these men do not die well, it will be a black matter for the king that led them to it; whom to disobey were against all proportion of subjection.

comments: 1 comment or Leave a comment

Time:03:33 pm
I have seen at least three fundamentally different analyses of what "happened" with Trump's win on Tuesday night. Each of them has some element of truth to it, but they give rise to very different models for response.

1) The first is well-represented by this Crooked Timber discussion around Ta-Nehisi-Coates argument that American democracy is fundamentally based on structural racism.

In the context of Trump's campaign and the things he said regarding Latinx and Black Americans (and probably other PoC groups as well, but those were the most prominent), to say nothing of the anti-Semitic undertones of some of the campaign advertising and the makeup of his alt-right supporters, it's obviously an important part of any analysis.

However, if one puts Trumpism and Trump into the broader context of Brexit, of France's Front National and other European nativist parties, it's clear that although race as a marker of in-group/out-group membership is a factor in almost all of these cases, it's hardly the specific historically conditioned form of American racism. In many cases the commonality would seem to be anti-immigrant sentiment (more on that below).

Note the significant support for Trump among Latinx and woman voters: although both explicit and structural racism and sexism are clearly factors in Clinton's defeat (and major factors, especially given the degree to which Hillary Clinton's entire career has been marked by fundamentally sexist evaluations which would have been different had a man been in the same position) this was not simply a revolt by white men against the other.

2) A second, divergent analysis is represented by Naomi Klein's Guardian article arguing that the fundamental problem is the underclasses who are losing out to globalism and neoliberalism. A milder form of the argument identifies the discontent driving Brexit, Trumpism, etc. with those who have lost work as a result of economic changes in the past two decades or so.

This argument at least takes the requirement of finding a generalizable course seriously. And it also has an obvious element of truth to it: the left is failing to mount much of a systematic alternative to the current system, and there certainly were Trump voters who had supported Sanders in the primaries. To the degree that anger at the elites is driven by income inequality and similar outcomes of the current system, it's certainly one underlying cause.

The problem is that the analyses of the makeup of Trump's vote and the Brexit vote (at least) suggest that the real losers are not driving the rejection of elite politics; instead the key demographics are those who are not at the sharp end of the stick, but rather those somewhat up the social and economic scale. They have certainly seen wage stagnation and the hollowing-out of rural life (they are, as a majority, rural), but they aren't dominated by the unemployed factory workers whose jobs have moved elsewhere. (This is not to say that such workers did not make up part of Trump's support; they were only part of it, however.)

In this context it's worth looking at the solution suggested by this analysis (and pushed quite heavily in Klein's article): that what is needed is a new firmly left-wing populist platform to provide an alternative to right-wing nativism. Developing a new progressive model which goes beyond tinkering at the edges of the system (the approach taken by the Clinton campaign) is a good thing in itself, but I see no evidence that as a way of confronting the current wave of events it would have been, or would be, successful. Corbyn has the firm support of the majority of Labourites, and Labour is not exactly succeeding at capturing the UK. In an election between Sanders and Trump, although there are certainly some ex-Sanders supporters who moved to support Trump, it's hard to believe that they outnumbered the centrists and less conservative Republicans who were willing to vote for Clinton but would have balked at an explicitly socialist candidate. Klein puffs the Leap Manifesto (while skimming over the fact that it's basically a family project) without noting that it's a manifesto for a party which has never come within any reasonable distance of national power (and the closest it came was under a relative centrist, Jack Layton, against a very unpopular Liberal leader as the alternative opposition choice) and which has been decried by the branches of that party that are actually in power provincially.

In the absence of this sort of economic dislocation, the anger fuelling Trump's win would have been less powerful, less widespread, and he would probably have failed. So in that sense it's a "cause"; but it's hard to imagine a progressive agenda to fix it which would have won in the context of the US. (The case of Brexit is special: an intelligent progressive would never have called the referendum in the first place. Ok, you can replace "progressive" with "human" in that last sentence.)

Note that a more aggressively progressive left is less likely to get anywhere if a significant source of malaise if future shock or its equivalent. Which leads us to...

3) A third analysis points at anger at fundamentally cultural change: Brexit voters who are Little Englanders, Americans who are nostalgic for the 1950's, people who really don't want to face anthropogenic climate change and thereby have to change their habits, rural dwellers whose communities are being hollowed out by internal shifts towards the cities as farming becomes more agribusiness and countries as a whole become more urban, Evangelicals who resent increasing secularism and immigrants with other religions (whether different faiths such as Islam or just different variants such as Hispanic Catholicism).

Resentment of immigration may slot into this model better than into point (2). Importing Mexicans to pick crops (à la George Murphy) does not obviously displace US workers; likewise, the NHS nurse from Poland at a local English hospital has probably been hired in the absence of sufficient English applicants for nursing positions. Both, however, are markers of change.

This fits many aspects of the general situation relatively well.

First, there's basically nothing that can be done about it. It's all very well to declaim "Turn back the universe and give me yesterday", but it won't work. Even a "succesful" imposition of political reaction does not restore the social fabric of the past (the German states of 1825 were not very much like the German states of 1785, regardless of what Prince Metternich was able to do).

I'm willing to bet that one of Trump's promises which will not be fulfilled is the full mass deportation of "unlawful immigrants": too many economic interests would be impacted (fruit is already withering on the vine in some areas because of an insufficient workforce). There may be a few dramatic staged raids of some form or another, but there will be nothing systematic and long-term. (Ditto with the wall: Congress is not about to authorize that expense.)

Secondly, it's always been around, in one form or another. (There have been long periods when social change moved at a snail's pace, but not since at least the Sixteenth Century.) My grandfather, who died in 1978, was born on a farm in the Annapolis valley where horses were the primary source of power and where there was no such thing as plumbing or electricity; by the time he died (living in Toronto) the Apollo missions were over, he drove a car and lived in a multicultural apartment building, and had lived through all the changes of the Twentieth Century.

Thirdly, insofar as some of this sort of malaise is driven by loss of relative status, or the fear thereof, any attempt to address it will result in keeping some variant of "the lower orders" down. (Hence the close relation of this sort of concern with point (1), and its close relation to analyses of privilege.)

If this is the biggest driver of this sort of electoral shift - a permanently angry and emotionally deracinated electorate - then it's not going to go away. (Immediate champions will be up like a rocket and down like the stick, as they prove unable to address the change fuelling the anger.)

The one upside of this is that there is something that can be done, if the analyses are correct: there is a negative correlation between educational level - a proxy for "being better informed" - and support for this sort of politics. Increasing the number of educated members of the population as part of a general initiative shows some promise of blunting this type of political force.

Finally, it's worth noting that none of these factors is "the" explanation for a Trump win: it was fuelled by a combination of general factors as well as by contingent events (it is arguable that Comey's intervention might have cost Clinton the Presidency, and even more arguable that a Clinton identical in all other respects who had not had a private e-mail server would now be President-elect).
comments: 4 comments or Leave a comment

Subject:I have a bone to pick with Dean's Tam Lin
Time:10:47 pm
Actually, two bones. One small one with the author and a much larger one with the current publisher's marketing department.

The smaller bone first: I was a faculty child for my undergraduate years, and an English major (along with a block of Classics). Janet's relative lack of knowledge of the university (specifically, the faculty) where her father teaches Romantics (mine taught Hegel) keeps breaking my WSOD.

Of my five professors in first year, I was acquainted with three, not because I chose courses based in whether I knew who taught them (though I did choose sections in two courses by what I knew of them: of the two professors, one I had known for eight years, and one I knew of only by name) but just because one becomes familiar with one's father's SCR and departmental colleagues, not to mention the number of faculty members whose children had gone to high school with one. And all my teachers, all the dons, my head of college, knew who I was.

Janet, by comparison, knows the campus, but not the people. I have a very hard time seeing her as a faculty child.

As for the bigger bone: this book was originally published as an adult fantasy book as part of Tor's Fairy Tale series. It has been republished, and marketed, as a YA/teen book.

This is a book whose full enjoyment depends on things like knowing who Robert Armin was, or what the actual sound of Shakespeare's English was like. It helps if one knows Le Roman de la Rose, The Lady's Not For Burning, Tourneur, Summer's Last Will and Testament, classical tragedy, and Stoppard, or at least about them. These are not things which any plausible typical teen is going to know. (I did, in fact, know these things by 19, by which time I was in second year university, but I'm pretty sure that's not the slot envisaged by "teen literature".) There is no reasonable sense in which this book can be considered as aimed at anything other than an adult audience, and a fairly well-educated adult audience at that.

Overall, though, it's a delightful book, and better (I think) than Diana Wynne Jones' Fire and Hemlock, although Jones has a better structure, starting in medias res. The disparity in ages in Jones' version works against the story, whereas the undergraduate atmosphere of Dean's story actively helps the flow of the story.
comments: Leave a comment

Subject:First Lensman and Trump
Time:01:39 pm
Trump's latest speech seems to me to read as though it were lifted from Senator Morgan's speeches in the campaign in First Lensman.
comments: Leave a comment

Subject:Question regarding qualifications
Time:01:14 pm
I keep hearing the statement that Hillary Clinton is "the most qualified presidential nominee ever".

Now I grant that she is among the most qualified nominees. But I look at John Quincy Adams (Senator 1803-1808, Secretary of State 1817-1825, and Ambassador to the Netherlands (1794-1797), Russia (1809-1814), and the United Kingdom / Court of St. James (1814-1817). Is it reasonable, even counting Clinton's experience as First Lady, to consider her more qualified?
comments: Leave a comment

Subject:Hell has officially frozen over
Time:12:22 pm
Glenn Beck has effectively endorsed Clinton.
comments: 2 comments or Leave a comment

Subject:GGK and Children of Earth and Sky
Time:09:51 pm
I was in Law School at the University of Toronto when The Summer Tree came out; I remember being amused by one of the central characters who is persuaded to come along by a promise of notes for his Evidence class (with Schiff, though Kay leaves the teacher's name out; but Kay went to U of T and would have deliberately chosen that course because of that teacher).

It made a big splash, and over the next couple of years the series was completed. It was a big piece of heroic fantasy which pulled out every stop it could - dark lord, elves, dwarves, Arthur, demigods; it showcased Kay's strength for pivotal scenes and introduced his tendency to deploy them for a somewhat manipulative effect.

Of all of the neo-Tolkienian authors of the 1980s and 90s Kay seems to me the only one who really picks up on Tolkien's theme of gradual loss over deep time and of reconciliation after a long fall: perhaps not surprisingly, given his involvement in the publication of The Silmarillion. The Fionavar Tapestry put at the centre of the story the possibilities of reconciliation and forgiveness over a very long time.

It also got classic High Fantasy out of Kay's system. Tigana was an entirely new departure, as non-Tolkienian as, say, Mirrlees or Eddison: a calque on Renaissance Italy, and with themes of group identity, revenge, freedom, and the trade offs that may need to be made in asserting "freedom".

As with A Song For Arbonne, however, the calque on history is not close. The Peninsula of the Palm has the air of Renaissance Italy, but its history is nothing like Italy's; and the equivalent of the Cathar crusade in Arbonne fails, as a result of the personal arc of the central characters. (Nor did the male/female god/goddess warlike/peaceful split parallel our history: if any historical figure from medieval France resembles the northerners, it's Bertran de Born.)

With the exception of Ysabel, which is a pendant to the Fionavar story with some additional European deep background, his subsequent books have been about individual interactions in the shadow of great events. Sometimes the core characters are central (Alfred the Great, El Cid) and sometimes they are peripheral.

The Lions of Al-Rassan is Kay's first book in the Jaddite / Sarantine parallel world. (Although the calqued-onto-history method is similar to that of his prior two books, they take place in different worlds. References to Fionavar, which is the base of all parallel worlds including our own do get into every book. And it's interesting to note that, given the latter point, it's certain that none of the Jaddites, Asharites, or Kindath are correct, as the gods are known in Fionavar and match none of their beliefs.) And it is the first to hew closely to our history.

It parallels the story of El Cid and the Reconquista in Iberia, but uses the freedom of alternative history to provide minor divergences, and, as in all of his works along these lines, his real focus is on the personal lives of his central characters, and with the ways in which minor chance occurrences or decisions can shape later great events.

If Tigana is about identity and liberty, and the costs they incur, Lions is about the tensions between tolerance and allegiance, and how personal loves and friendships cut across them.

Lions' characters are central agents. By contrast, the Sarantine Mosaic gives us a picture of a slightly modified Justinian and Theodora through the eyes of a peripheral figure, the mosaicist Crispin (and a history which diverges more from our own). By the time of Children of Earth and Sky Crispin's name has been forgotten and his mosaics - those which survive at all - vary between having been destroyed (Sarantium), being in the process of falling apart (the chapel in Trakesia) and being still significant (that world's equivalent to Ravenna). It helps to have read the duology before the latter book.

With a significant degree of variation, Kay explores the interaction between individual lives and personal intent (at one pole) and large-scale events with an impact on society (at the other) and the elements of chance and unexpected consequences which connect the two together.

Kay has been criticized for the use of "manipulative" narrative tricks to engage the reader emotionally. I see the tricks, but I don't think of them as major flaws so much as shorthand, the activity of an occasionally intrusive narrator in a literary world where intrusive narration is less popular than it used to be. (Another aspect of this is the way in which the perspective of the narrator can briefly shift to an historical one, referring to the state of a place, or a person's reputation, centuries after the end of the story.)

Children of Earth and Sky is classically Kay: four characters (a spy, an artist, a pirate and a Janissary) pass through and in various ways influence events following the fall of Sarantium to the Asharites (that world's analogue of the fall of Constantinople). Like Crispin in The Sarantine Mosaic, they are peripheral: their various actions just miss having an immediate major impact until the one whom one would think least likely - the artist - changes the course of events for the next couple of generations decisively. (The El Cid and Albert the Great

One obvious parallel is Dunnet's The Year of the Ram, set mainly in Trebizond in a similar time frame. Kay is not in a position to provide as close-grained an image of the life of the time and place as Dunnet is: he has to deal with the limitations as well as the advantages of a made-up world. But Dunnet can't alter the succession of events, and Niccolo remains a onlooker to a course of events he (by definition) can't really affect.
comments: Leave a comment

Tags:, ,
Time:05:44 pm
Review with SpoilersCollapse )
comments: 3 comments or Leave a comment

Subject:The Nightmare Stacks
Time:09:16 pm
The Nightmare Stacks is, I think, best approached as a generalization of the previous Laundry Files novels. Although the novel is about Alex, it's not about his reactions in the same way that the early novels were about Bob's reactions (usually for humorous effects). This is about the role of the Laundry as a whole in a world shifting towards Nightmare.

Cut for Spoilers...Collapse )
comments: 1 comment or Leave a comment

Subject:In the category of "read the book before you summarize it"
Time:09:20 pm
The following is the CBC's capsule summary of Tigana from its list of 100 great Canadian novels from last July (they had a list of nonfiction this year, about which the less said the better):

Peninsula of the Palm is a cursed country. Warrior sorcerers have taken control of most of it, destroying as much culture and infrastructure as they can in the process. Nowhere is it worse than it is in in Tigana -- a place so dire that people can't even speak its name. But after years of living in darkness, citizens begin a movement to reclaim their beloved country. Guy Gavriel Kay's rich tale of fantasy and revenge is a reflection on what it means to lose one's culture and identity -- a theme sure to strike home with any reader.

Nearly every sentence of that paragraph is wrong in some way (beginning with omitting the "The" which ought to be the first word) - if not directly, then by implication.

ETA: Having glanced at the blurb on the back of the current paperback, it is clear from structural similarities that this results from the blurb being plagiarised^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H rewritten by someone who had not read the book. Bad, bad C.B.C.
comments: Leave a comment

[icon] Sunt Lacrimae Rerum
View:Recent Entries.
You're looking at the latest 20 entries.
Missed some entries? Then simply jump back 20 entries