(No, I haven't read the book.)
Without expressing a direct opinion on the racefail-allied aspects of the premises and the ensuing discussion --
I just finished rereading 1491 and I noted the emphasis on the degree to which the "wilderness" which the setllers found was actually a heavily human-formed landscape -- with the obvious implications that a genuinely "virgin forest" landscape would be rather different.
Accordingly -- how could one possibly imagine that a European settlement pattern in such an alternate timeline would resemble that of our timeline in any particular?
Just wondering.
May 14 2009, 00:19:24 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2009, 01:45:50 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2009, 01:51:48 UTC 3 years ago
An interesting point of comparison is with Years of Rice and Salt, which starts out promisingly "different" close to the point of departure but seems to be warped forcefully by fate/the author into having a Renaissance and then a First World War roughly on schedule -- a parallel rather than a radiating history (which I also found rather unbelievable).
May 14 2009, 04:55:00 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2009, 10:12:53 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2009, 18:16:41 UTC 3 years ago
May 14 2009, 02:41:52 UTC 3 years ago
I didn't think that Thirteenth Child was all that great, but I didn't particularly see this problem with it. There are some differences in settlement patterns as compared to our world; e.g., its dangerous to cross the Mississippi, and the Rocky Mountains are more dangerous yet, because of magical creatures out west, so there's no city of Denver, and may never be one. There are also, it seems, some similarities, which can be accounted for on the grounds I've set forth.